Review




Structured Review

InterBioScreen Ltd interbioscreen-natural compound libraries
Virtual screening workflow adopted in this study. Approximately 1.9 million compounds were collated from three different libraries <t>(ChEMBL,</t> <t>InterBioScreen-natural,</t> and DrugBank-approved). ChEMBl and InterBioScreen-natural compound libraries were subjected to filtering to discard molecules that are less likely to be good drug candidates. A clean library of ~0.9 million compounds that includes the DrugBank-approved library was then subjected to hierarchical modes of docking simulations (HTVS, SP, XP). Nearly 2,000 hits obtained from this screening step were subjected to analyses to prioritize 22 promising compounds for further investigation as potential Mtb USP (Rv1636) binders. *The DrugBank-approved drugs library was not subjected to this filtering step as discussed in the text.
Interbioscreen Natural Compound Libraries, supplied by InterBioScreen Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/interbioscreen-natural compound libraries/product/InterBioScreen Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
interbioscreen-natural compound libraries - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Identification of Potential Binders of Mtb Universal Stress Protein (Rv1636) Through an in silico Approach and Insights Into Compound Selection for Experimental Validation"

Article Title: Identification of Potential Binders of Mtb Universal Stress Protein (Rv1636) Through an in silico Approach and Insights Into Compound Selection for Experimental Validation

Journal: Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences

doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.599221

Virtual screening workflow adopted in this study. Approximately 1.9 million compounds were collated from three different libraries (ChEMBL, InterBioScreen-natural, and DrugBank-approved). ChEMBl and InterBioScreen-natural compound libraries were subjected to filtering to discard molecules that are less likely to be good drug candidates. A clean library of ~0.9 million compounds that includes the DrugBank-approved library was then subjected to hierarchical modes of docking simulations (HTVS, SP, XP). Nearly 2,000 hits obtained from this screening step were subjected to analyses to prioritize 22 promising compounds for further investigation as potential Mtb USP (Rv1636) binders. *The DrugBank-approved drugs library was not subjected to this filtering step as discussed in the text.
Figure Legend Snippet: Virtual screening workflow adopted in this study. Approximately 1.9 million compounds were collated from three different libraries (ChEMBL, InterBioScreen-natural, and DrugBank-approved). ChEMBl and InterBioScreen-natural compound libraries were subjected to filtering to discard molecules that are less likely to be good drug candidates. A clean library of ~0.9 million compounds that includes the DrugBank-approved library was then subjected to hierarchical modes of docking simulations (HTVS, SP, XP). Nearly 2,000 hits obtained from this screening step were subjected to analyses to prioritize 22 promising compounds for further investigation as potential Mtb USP (Rv1636) binders. *The DrugBank-approved drugs library was not subjected to this filtering step as discussed in the text.

Techniques Used:



Similar Products

90
InterBioScreen Ltd interbioscreen-natural compound libraries
Virtual screening workflow adopted in this study. Approximately 1.9 million compounds were collated from three different libraries <t>(ChEMBL,</t> <t>InterBioScreen-natural,</t> and DrugBank-approved). ChEMBl and InterBioScreen-natural compound libraries were subjected to filtering to discard molecules that are less likely to be good drug candidates. A clean library of ~0.9 million compounds that includes the DrugBank-approved library was then subjected to hierarchical modes of docking simulations (HTVS, SP, XP). Nearly 2,000 hits obtained from this screening step were subjected to analyses to prioritize 22 promising compounds for further investigation as potential Mtb USP (Rv1636) binders. *The DrugBank-approved drugs library was not subjected to this filtering step as discussed in the text.
Interbioscreen Natural Compound Libraries, supplied by InterBioScreen Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/interbioscreen-natural compound libraries/product/InterBioScreen Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
interbioscreen-natural compound libraries - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InterBioScreen Ltd interbioscreen-natural compound library
Virtual screening workflow adopted in this study. Approximately 1.9 million compounds were collated from three different libraries <t>(ChEMBL,</t> <t>InterBioScreen-natural,</t> and DrugBank-approved). ChEMBl and InterBioScreen-natural compound libraries were subjected to filtering to discard molecules that are less likely to be good drug candidates. A clean library of ~0.9 million compounds that includes the DrugBank-approved library was then subjected to hierarchical modes of docking simulations (HTVS, SP, XP). Nearly 2,000 hits obtained from this screening step were subjected to analyses to prioritize 22 promising compounds for further investigation as potential Mtb USP (Rv1636) binders. *The DrugBank-approved drugs library was not subjected to this filtering step as discussed in the text.
Interbioscreen Natural Compound Library, supplied by InterBioScreen Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/interbioscreen-natural compound library/product/InterBioScreen Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
interbioscreen-natural compound library - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InterBioScreen Ltd natural compound library interbioscreen [25]
Virtual screening workflow adopted in this study. Approximately 1.9 million compounds were collated from three different libraries <t>(ChEMBL,</t> <t>InterBioScreen-natural,</t> and DrugBank-approved). ChEMBl and InterBioScreen-natural compound libraries were subjected to filtering to discard molecules that are less likely to be good drug candidates. A clean library of ~0.9 million compounds that includes the DrugBank-approved library was then subjected to hierarchical modes of docking simulations (HTVS, SP, XP). Nearly 2,000 hits obtained from this screening step were subjected to analyses to prioritize 22 promising compounds for further investigation as potential Mtb USP (Rv1636) binders. *The DrugBank-approved drugs library was not subjected to this filtering step as discussed in the text.
Natural Compound Library Interbioscreen [25], supplied by InterBioScreen Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/natural compound library interbioscreen [25]/product/InterBioScreen Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
natural compound library interbioscreen [25] - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Virtual screening workflow adopted in this study. Approximately 1.9 million compounds were collated from three different libraries (ChEMBL, InterBioScreen-natural, and DrugBank-approved). ChEMBl and InterBioScreen-natural compound libraries were subjected to filtering to discard molecules that are less likely to be good drug candidates. A clean library of ~0.9 million compounds that includes the DrugBank-approved library was then subjected to hierarchical modes of docking simulations (HTVS, SP, XP). Nearly 2,000 hits obtained from this screening step were subjected to analyses to prioritize 22 promising compounds for further investigation as potential Mtb USP (Rv1636) binders. *The DrugBank-approved drugs library was not subjected to this filtering step as discussed in the text.

Journal: Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences

Article Title: Identification of Potential Binders of Mtb Universal Stress Protein (Rv1636) Through an in silico Approach and Insights Into Compound Selection for Experimental Validation

doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.599221

Figure Lengend Snippet: Virtual screening workflow adopted in this study. Approximately 1.9 million compounds were collated from three different libraries (ChEMBL, InterBioScreen-natural, and DrugBank-approved). ChEMBl and InterBioScreen-natural compound libraries were subjected to filtering to discard molecules that are less likely to be good drug candidates. A clean library of ~0.9 million compounds that includes the DrugBank-approved library was then subjected to hierarchical modes of docking simulations (HTVS, SP, XP). Nearly 2,000 hits obtained from this screening step were subjected to analyses to prioritize 22 promising compounds for further investigation as potential Mtb USP (Rv1636) binders. *The DrugBank-approved drugs library was not subjected to this filtering step as discussed in the text.

Article Snippet: It is to be noted that the ChEMBL and InterBioScreen-Natural compound libraries of molecules have been filtered through REOS, PAINS, and Lipinski's rule of five filters as a prescreening step.

Techniques: